This is not the first time that you have stated this. The first time I
let it pass,
but you persist in repeating what is factually incorrect.
There is no hendiadys involved here. To qualify as hendiadys there must
be a copula between the two terms. Absent a copula this is not
hendiadys.
Yes, I know. This is a TERRIBLE error! He references the English
versification rather than the Hebrew! He should be drawn and quartered.
Seriously now, this may be an incorrect practice, but if you know that
the systems differ then I would say it is NBD (no big deal). Do try to
not be utterly pedantic.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.