To: "Heard, Christopher" <Christopher.Heard AT pepperdine.edu>
Cc: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Proverbs 5:16 - a declaration or a question ?
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:39:10 +0000
At 07:43 27/12/2004, Heard, Christopher wrote:
Well ... maybe, if we knew what the reasons were, but not simply by
invocation of authority.
Well, perhaps they were ready to invoke the authority of Gesenius ( as
already noted in George F Somsel's posting of Dec. 26 ):
>>>
H. G. Mitchell, 'The omission of the interrogative particle,' in Old Test.
and Sem. Studies in memory of W. R. Harper, Chicago, 1907, i, 113 ff.
1. A question need not necessarily be introduced by a special interrogative
pronoun or adverb. Frequently 1 the natural emphasis upon the words is of
itself sufficient to indicate an interrogative sentence as such;
........................................ Pr 5:16.
1 1 Mitchell (op. cit.) restricts the number of instances to 39, of which
he attributes 12 (or 17) to corruption of the text. Thus in Gn 27:24 he
would road, with the Samaritan, as in verso 21, in 1 S 16:4 , in 2 S 18:29
as in verse 32; similarly he would read the interrogative particle in 2 K
5:26, Ez 11:3, Jb 40:25, 41:1; 1 S 30:8, 2 K 9:19, Ez 11:13, 17:9.
Gesenius, F. W. (2003). Gesenius' Hebrew grammar (E. Kautzsch & S. A. E.
Cowley, Ed.) (2d English ed.) (Page 473). Bellingham, WA: Logos Research
Systems, Inc.
<<<
Maurice A. O'Sullivan
[Bray, Ireland]
mauros AT iol.ie
"Mere description is impossible. Language forces you to an implicit
comment." C.S. Lewis
Fw: [b-hebrew] logograms--an ode to Hebrew
, (continued)