Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] logograms--an ode to Hebrew
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:24:55 +0200
Dear Liz,
> Akkadian is derived from Sumerian and
> that Sumerian and Egyptian hieroglyphs vie for the status of oldest
> written language.
My guess is that Hebrew (or Semitic, for this matter) is an artificial
grammatical structure overlaid on the existing natural ("mumbling")
language.
> Second, many Hebrew roots have only two letters, qm, b', lk, and these
> are the most common. It is easy to see how these could have started out
> as grunts.
No argument about this. The issue is the language as we know it, with very
strict three-letter roots (two-letter ones received waw, hey, ayn-ayn, etc).
And that language strongly seems based on certain arbitrary assumptions,
foremost--the fixed root length.
But, again and again, what I see as the biggest question is that convention
of specifically three-"letter" roots predates the concept of letter. At the
time when the root length was fixed as three letters, the concept of letter
did not exist yet.
Vadim Cherny
Re: [b-hebrew] logograms--an ode to Hebrew
, (continued)