At 05:56 PM 12/16/2004, you wrote:
The bottom of Chesapeake Bay was mud, at the point described. But if the bottom of the Yam Suph was rock, or gravel, or coral reef, or even firm sand, your objection fails. Don't argue from an incidental point in an imperfect analogy.
The difficulty in your explanation is the fact that the "if" demonstrate the unlikelihood that it can be the best solution. ...
Further, it wasn't my analogy and the point is not incidental to the main- which is that there is a possible "naturalistic" explanation to the event.This is indeed the more important issue. You seem to object to naturalistic explanations, but why? Well, maybe you should not answer that one here. But I would be interested in an off-list answer.
Historically, perhaps not. But linguistically, yes. Whatever the actual historical events lying behind the Exodus and Psalm 106 narratives, these narratives describe (linguistically) a world (which may be partly fictional) in which the heroes were rescued from destruction by something unusual happening at just the right time. This is not just part of biblical narrative, it is the stuff of Hollywood, where heroes are regularly saved (sometimes several times a second, e.g. in battle and car chase scenes) by the timing of unrelated events. These unrelated events are not usually supernatural, or even particularly rare in themselves, it is their often split-second timing which saves the heroes. And within the Exodus and Psalm 106 narratives there is no indication that the drying up of the Yam Suph was anything more than one of these happy coincidences, except that the timing is explicitly ascribed to God, rather than, as sometimes in the Hollywood equivalents, some kind of protecting fate.
In fact Exodus makes it very clear that the surface that the Israelites walked on was the bottom of the Yam Suph, laid bare and dry by a strong wind. The timing was miraculous, of course, and perhaps the wind strength was as well. But there is no indication that there was anything miraculous about the surface, or that it was any drier than would be expected from the sea water receding from it.
Whether it was miraculous or not cannot be determined either historically or linquistically.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.