On Sunday 28 November 2004 06:57, B. M. Rocine wrote:
[snip]
> Take your example of two wayyiqtols in Jer 51:29. The consensus among the
> five or six modern translators I checked is that the wayyiqtols are
> non-past; they differ on whether to translate them as present or future. I
> quickly vote future with you. I do not, however, think the text is
> evidence that the wayyiqtols are not perfective. The perfectivity of the
> forms is utilized to explicitly embed sequentiality into the text. I think
> translations should use the word *then* or *so*: "Then the land will
> quake, then it will writhe for the thoughts of YHWH stand against Babel."
Bryan,
Would you insist that they use the word "then" or "so" in Judges 12:9-14 as
well?