On 11/25/04 12:04 PM, "Ken Penner" <pennerkm AT mcmaster.ca> wrote:
>> When you describe J-M as "newer" do you mean "newer than WOC"
>> or "newer than GKC"?
>
> I meant newer than GKC. It seems to me that Muraoka's revisions were
> thorough. I suspect if it's in J-M, it has passed Muraoka's very careful and
> well-informed scrutiny.
Is J-M a more of a reference work than a text book? I mean in comparison to
WOC which is both. I cannot imagine using GKC as a text book and I am
wondering if J-M is more like GKC in that respect.