Dear Peter,
that is what I said about common sense. Assuming the removal of jewelry to be a general act of mourning is a matter of common sense and not explicitely belonging to the world of the Bible. You are however bringing inside your 21-st century common sense, which might look completely different from an LBA view point.
As for whether removing jewellery was a sign of mourning ('BL Hithpael, 'EBEL, 'ABEL) among the Israelites: It is entirely clear that mourning was associated with wearing sackcloth and other mourning clothes: Gen 37:34; 2 Sam 14:2; Est 4:3; Psa 35:13,14; Isa 61:3; Jer 6:26; Ezk 7:27(?), 24:17; Amos 8:10; Micah 1:8. This is something hardly compatible with wearing jewellery. See also Ezk 26:15-17, where taking off embroidered garments is clearly a sign of mourning. In fact I would think that it is more or less a cultural universal that people wear less adornment as an indication of mourning. Does anyone know of any counter-examples?
In the story of Dinah is also reccuring such a scene of abandon of jewelry, once more in context with some idol(s). This time however as part of the booty taken by the sack of Schechem.
Is this same gesture once more a gesture of mourning or is part of a general
rule, that one has to abandon jewelry? Or is simply the hand of the same
redactor as before applying his ingenious scheme? Notice: there must have
existed a northern kingdom story treating the antecedents of the temple of
Beth-El and of his golden calf. As a matter of fact it seems that the
judahite version we own is worked out of the material of such a work, since
most in book Genesis is dealing with northern later-cult places. Actually
except Hebron (since the reference to Jerusalem as place of the sacrifice of
Abraham might be a later interpolation - Moria seems to be a name linked to
Schechem primarily - thus Moreh) practically everything.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.