On 9/17/04 6:34 AM, "Rolf Furuli" <furuli AT online.no> wrote:
Because my model turns completely upside down the almost universally
accepted grammatical ideas of modern hebraists ...
On 9/17/04 6:46 AM, "Peter Kirk" <peterkirk AT qaya.org> wrote:
I am aware that one of your main points
is that semantic meaning is uncancellable (and this is what I mainly
object to)...
I find some room for agreement with both Peter and Rolf.
The proposition: "semantic meaning is uncancellable" turns completely upside
down the almost universally accepted ideas about semantics.
However, if Rolf is drawing a distinction between the meaning attached to
the code (morphology, etc) and the inferential meaning provided by the
cognitive framework of the audience then this seems like an idea worth
exploring.
I have been approaching the position* (without actually arriving there) that
the code is semantically vacuous. ...
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.