----- Original Message -----
From: MarianneLuban AT aol.com
> In a message dated 8/27/2004 4:45:41 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> formoria AT carolina.rr.com writes:
>
>
> > Now you're speaking of two different things. One can be correct yet
> > persuade noone. Cassandra, anyone? Being correct does not require a
> > consensus. Being correct requires only that one's arguments contain the
> > facts.
>
> However, in science, if you persuade no one--then you are out of luck.
In the case of science, one may just be ahead of his time, later to be
recognized for his contributions, as was Gregor Mendel. Like him, your day
may come.
Karl W. Randolph.
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
Re: believed, was [b-hebrew] Shishak,
Karl Randolph, 08/29/2004