On Friday, August 27, 2004, at 08:46 PM, MarianneLuban AT aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 8/27/2004 4:45:41 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
formoria AT carolina.rr.com writes:
Now you're speaking of two different things. One can be correct yet
persuade noone. Cassandra, anyone? Being correct does not require a
consensus. Being correct requires only that one's arguments contain the
facts.
However, in science, if you persuade no one--then you are out of luck.
In what way is one out of luck? Ostracized?
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.