In a message dated 8/26/2004 6:13:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
formoria AT carolina.rr.com writes:
The discussion was not about those two individuals. It was about David
Rohl. Are you putting all three men in the same category? And are all 3
equally worth dismissal?
Even a broken watch is right twice in 24 hours. So a human being can be
correct here and there, as well. Was Nostradamus so different from Rohl and
Velikovsky?
Not if he was "guessing" ;-^ But everyone in Egyptology has to take a guess
now and then--in fact on plenty of occasions. I suppose it is once again a
question of how one phrases ones suppositions. Best to leave a question mark
there--a wise counsel we all do not always heed. And are usually sorry later.
It is those who hardly ever leave a question mark and write things on the
order of "Now I am going to show you the statue of Joseph"--that tend to alienate
the savants.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.