..
Now for the rest........As far as Zoar is concerned the scripture leaves us
with no doubt that this is a FUTURE name by the words "the same is Zoar" so
that is cleared up. Dan is mentioned and from the context obviouly refers
to that territory which is OBVIOUSLY not dan's yet, everyone would know that
right! The country of the Amalekites seems not to be so clear. And this is
ONLY a question OK, WHY say this and not refer DIRECTLY to whoever was
defeated in that particular land? Surely that would be the same as if I
said:
"and Hitler invaded the lands of the Jutes, angles and saxons"????
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.