> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
>
> Karl,
>
> That's precisely what's wrong with your approach. You attempt to make
> the meaning of a word in any particular context fit the procrustean bed
> of your preconceptions. As a consequence you end up with a wrong
> understanding.
>
> george
> gfsomsel
Interesting, that is exactly my impression of your approach.
My understanding of your approach is that you take the definitions as given
by cognate languages and lexica, and force it into Biblical Hebrew, even
where its meaning is forced at best.
My first reaction upon reading this verse in Hebrew was, This is wierd! It
doesnt make sense. until after several more times reading it to come to the
conclusion that KPH probably had almost the opposite definition as given.
Though after reading reactions to my question, it looks as if Peter Kirk gave
a better answer than my conclusion.
Karl W. Randolph.
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm