On the question of Job 39:13, these are the steps I took to tease out a simple sentence that made sense and fit the context. Do you remember? I didnt need to do the final step with that verse.
Harold, are these the steps you take when you disagree with me?
But if all you do is to present someone elses translation, how convincing is that? Especially when I may disagree with the translator on several points? Or do you have another methodology that you havent explained?
With what aspects of this methodology do you disagree and why?
Is there any way to improve this methodology?
Oh yes, this methodology is combined with my presupposition borne out in practice that lexemes usually, though not always, have only one root definition and its definition will be recognizable in other lexemes from the same root.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.