Skip to Content.
Please activate JavaScript in your web browser
List archive
[b-hebrew] Why mitachat and mi'al instead of tachat and al?
Chronological
Thread
<
Chronological
>
<
Thread
>
From
: "Dora Smith" <villandra AT austin.rr.com>
To
: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject
: [b-hebrew] Why mitachat and mi'al instead of tachat and al?
Date
: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 06:15:27 -0500
In Genesis 1:7, why does it say "mitachat" for under the waters, and "mi'al"
for "above the waters"?
These words appear to contain a superfluous "from". "From under" and "from
upon" instead of under and upon.
Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, Texas
villandra AT austin.rr.com
[b-hebrew] Why mitachat and mi'al instead of tachat and al?
,
Dora Smith, 06/14/2004
Archive powered by
MHonArc 2.6.24
.