This is close
to what Chomsky says, actually. There is a built-in mechanism in our minds
for understanding the structure of language;
Three days ago a linguist called Larry Trask, who had never accepted this,
died.
As his obituary in " The Times " [ London ] of March 28 stated:
>> He rejected any theory that could not be supported through evidence and
refuted much that was myth and conjecture. <<
and it went on to deal specifically with this point of Chomsky's
>> Trask was an opponent of Chomsky's theories of Universal Grammar, first
proposed in the late 1950s and by this time widely accepted. Chomsky had
proposed that some fundamentals of grammar are hard-wired into the human
brain before birth, but that some options within it are fixed later by
experience. Trask believed that there was no evidence to support this idea,
and that it should not be taught as fact. His own arguments were always
based on sound knowledge of facts and scientific principles, and he would
take the greatest pains to make sure they were understood by everyone from
first-year undergraduates to colleagues and competitors. <<
Maurice A. O'Sullivan [ Bray, Ireland ]
mauros AT iol.ie