patah (as in haburah) is NEVER reduced to hatef.
Besides, even if reduction would be there, dagesh would remain.
Sincerely,
Vadim Cherny
>To begin with, haburah is a different word from havurah, since otherwiseyou
>cannot account for hatef (ex-kamatz) in havurah.
HH: The hatef is there because of the 3ms pronominal suffix that has
been added to XBRH in Isa 53:5. When you add a pronoun suffix, it
often reduces the first vowel of the noun.
Yours,
Harold Holmyard
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.