>For example - Following a reading of Genesis 4:1: The verb TeLeD
>(supposedly an imperfect that I absolutely can not fit into any known
>conjugation) Working on the premise that I am at fault in my understanding I
>try to look it up. It is listed on page 468 under number 146. And yes this
>provides, in this instance, no further understanding of the way this
>imperfect?? is conjugated.
>Thankyou, Chris.
TeLeD is listed under the root YLD. TeLeD (ignoring the waw in Genesis 4:1)
is Qal Imperfect 3fs (could be in theory also 2ms, but is meaningless and
does not exist, as long as males do not give birth Jer 30:6) of a specific
subtype of weak verbs, i.e., weak verbs starting with a Yod where the first
consonant of the verbal root drops off in every form of the imperfect
inflection and the imperfect preformative vowel is Tsere throughout. Verbs of
this type are difficult to recognize because the initial consonant Yod is
lost, leaving only the second and third consonants of the verbal root. (The
Yod in the 3ms and 3mp [YeLeD, YeLDu does not exist for this root] forms is
the Imperfect preformative and not the first consonant of the verbal root).
Other examples: TeSheV, from YShV (to sit); TeLeCh, from HLCh (to go), which
inflects in the same way despite the H instead of Yod.
Even shoshan doesnt get into that how can he? A different issue I have
with him is that on about 3-5 occasions I looked up words that were not
mentioned at all in his concordance, and Im pretty sure I checked the right
place. He did not work with a computer.
On Saturday 22 May 2004 08:51, wattswestmaas wrote:
> Dear Most experienced scholars,
>
> A rather quick question about 'The Learning Methodology' for mastering weak
> verbs. Are there any tips and tricks (apart from having a book with the
> complete conjugations) about grasping them OR is it a simple case of
> "forget it, just learn how to recognise them in their various forms"
>
> What do the majority of you do - if I may ask?
Chris,
I learned a handful of rules regarding things like vowel lengthening, open
and
closed syllables, and the like, that I was able to use in reading to make at
least an educated guess about the form of a word. In the case of T"LED that
someone else brought up, for example, the tsere under the preformative tells
me at once that there's a reason for the lengthening: most likely, an
assimilated yod that is probably part of the root. That gives me a root YLD,
which I can then look up if I don't already know it. The beginning grammar I
learned from was Marks and Rogers, and it spent a lot of time on such things,
showing typical vowel lengthening and reducing patterns in various kinds of
weak verbs. I can highly recommend this kind of approach, because it not
only avoids memorizing those godawful paradigm lists, but it gives you visual
cues for spotting unorthodox forms as well.
>From there I can offer three pieces of advice: read, read, read.
--
Dave Washburn http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
Learning about Christianity from a non-Christian
is like getting a kiss over the telephone.