To this situation a surprising twist is introduced: exile is announced (39:5-7) and then it is to end (40:1-2)! The surprise is that their iniquity has been atoned for, yet nirstah creates an uncertainty about how this has occurred, i.e. is the niphal reflexive or passive? An ambiguity is introduced, fanned by the ambiguous dual kiplayim. In what way has Jerusalem received an equivalent punishment for so many years rebellious years--for judgement is proclaimed then quickly announced as complete? All this good news they are to herald (40:9), yet how this has been achieved is hidden by nirstah.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.