I could have sworn that the wacons form of נתן was וַיִּתֶן (or something
similar)! I must just have been out of it. Now that I have looked at it,
וַיִּתֵּן is the regular wacons form (as far as I can see).
תודה רבה
יונה מישאל בן אברהם
----- Original Message -----
From: "UUC" <unikom AT paco.net>
To: <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Isaiah 53
> Dear Jason,
>
> Would you clarify your point? wayiten with the same vowelization is found
in
> Gen1:17, etc
>
> >I thought that the wacons (vav-consecutive) form of NTN נתן was pointed
> differently: vayiten (with a penultimate stress and a segol in the
ultima).
> So, I would take the text as it is as a future tense because the vowel
> quality is not shifted for the wacons.<
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Vadim Cherny