On 3/14/04 2:26 PM, "Peter Kirk" <peterkirk AT qaya.org> wrote:Well, it is not really off topic as this is a key point in my criticism of Rolf's work.
On the other hand, the aorist indicative
is unambiguously past.
A better way to say this is the aorist indicative is unambiguously aorist.
S.Porter buried the notion that the "aorist indicative is unambiguously
past" 15 years ago (1989).
This is off topic, so I will desist.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.