>===== Original Message From Lance Petersen <petersenlance AT yahoo.com> =====
>None of these things are possible with paper documents. (My BDB is *So* two
weeks ago!) This helps make for what I would call effective study.
I just have a couple of thoughts here. First, in response to what you say
above, I agree that having computer access to things like dictionary and
concordance lookups is a lot more efficient. In fact, the last time I was
trying to make more room in my library, I ended up loaning some Greek and
Hebrew concordances to my church library, because I just never use them.
BibleWorks is much more versatile in what it can find, and I can link directly
to the contexts without having to flip madly through BHS. Even so, there is at
least one drawback that I can think of--a significant enough drawback, that I
would encourage you to keep BDB handy. Consider the difference between
shopping in a bookstore and at Amazon.com. In a bookstore, you go find the
section you're interested in. Maybe you're looking for a new release, or maybe
you have the topic in mind. You might even know exactly what book you want,
but to find it, you have to do a little browsing through the shelves. (Make it
a used bookstore, and the adventure only grows.) At Amazon.com, you simply go
to the search engine and plug in whatever--the title if you want a particular
book, or keywords if not. Often it will take you directly to the book for you.
Other times, it might give you a small subset to choose from. But there is no
meandering through a given section in the store. For one thing, there are just
too many books to do that productively. For another, most of the need is gone.
Amazon.com might try to keep you there a while by recommending other books,
but it's pretty easy to pass them by. Another difference is that you have only
limited ability to pick up a book and flip through it. They're getting better
about providing sample pages, but it's a pretty restrictive approach.
Anyway, my point here is that looking up words can be much the same as
shopping for books. Along the way to finding the word you're concerned with,
you just might see something interesting. By restricting yourself to
computerized links, this possibility is seriously minimized. Particularly with
BDB, the arrangement according to roots (although problematic at times) can
afford several interesting connections.
[snipped]
>Let those problems get hammered out now. That way, I , or someone
>li
> ke me,
> won't see years worth of work on a pet project go up in flames because of a
software oversight.
My second thought is that things are perhaps not as dismal as you might think.
ASCII isn't going anywhere. Unicode was specifically designed to make sure it
would retain the same coding. You might want to keep your font under lock and
key :-) but otherwise, I wouldn't worry too much about your library becoming
obsolete. (If Peter et al. can provide you with a means to convert the whole
thing, well and good. I'm just saying you shouldn't think your life's work is
down the drain because Unicode now exists.
Trevor Peterson
CUA/Semitics
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.