Dave wrote:
>
> Strongs Hebrew word #5771b avown [2 Kings 7:9]
> I assume that you would transliterate this as "awown" with
> the 2nd "w" superscripted? I think that a superscripted 2nd
> "w" would be more accurate, or more understandable
Yes--it would help avoid the impression that ow constitutes a diphthong
without losing the presence of the mater.
>
> Strong's Hebrew word #3091b Yehowshu'a
> I think that a superscripted "w" would be more accurate, or
> more undersatandable. Would you transliterate the 'ayin as
> James Strong transliterates it?
I would put the a before the ` (note that I would use ` rather than '
for `ayin).