Peter,I think we already know we have a hapax legomenon in this verse. Well, the MT ka'ari is not strictly a hapax, but the Nahal Hever form is. As there are already a large number of hapaxes in the Hebrew Bible, there is no good reason to reject the suggestion that this is one.
So, would we then--if we accept this version--suggest a hapax legomenon in
this verse?
Regards,
Jason
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.