Peter,Thank you for the clarification. JTC1 obviously should be waiting for input from the community of users of ISO 8957, who are probably not concentrated in Israel but scattered worldwide. From my limited knowledge of the procedures,it seems that the best channel for such input to the ISO committees is through the UTC, which represents users rather than national bodies.
I was referring to the statement: "JTC1 is waiting for Israel to make a case
for these, as they did when the TC46 standard was under development."
You contradict yourself in saying both "This is not a matter in which theI don't actually expect the latter. If the Israeli NB chooses to do so, ISO 8957 might then be considered redundant. As it probably won't, ISO 8957 has an important place not least as the only standard way to represent the characters in question.
views of the Israeli NB should be decisive" and expecting that "all of the
characters in it are incorporated into SII 1311".
Jony
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Kirk [mailto:peterkirk AT qaya.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:29 PM
To: Jony Rosenne
Cc: hebrew AT unicode.org; 'Biblical Languages'; 'Biblical Hebrew'; 'Hebrew Computing list'; 'Elaine Keown'; 'Michael Everson'
Subject: Re: [hebrew] Re: Hebrew marks in ISO 8957 but not in Unicode
On 01/10/2003 14:47, Jony Rosenne wrote:
The Israeli NB had asked ISO to cancel this standard. Idoubt it willmake a case to the contrary.This is not a matter in which the views of the Israeli NB should be decisive. ...
Jony
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.