[SB:] But doesn't failure to express literary features of the originalYou are right, of course. Literary and structural features are part of the meaning of the text, and so they need to be rendered in a translation, as far as possible, by literary and structural features which have the same function in the target language. That doesn't mean that they have the same form.
compromise accuracy and clarity, too? For that matter, what features of
the original are *not* literary? I hope you're not suggesting that
structural features are merely ornamental, while all the meaning that
matters is conveyed at the local level.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.