I dont see any reason why not. Just look at the context. Ezra himself does
not appear in the book until Ezra 7:1. Ezra 16 chronicled what went on
before his appearance on the scene, and the last four chapters his personal
experiences. What little Hebrew in the first six chapters is not enough to
prove a difference in authorship, even if all he did was to redact what he
had received from others.
The Aramaic sections are merely he said this and he did that which, if
accurately reported, will show the styles of the he quoted.
Karl W. Randolph.
You wrote:
> Dear All,
> I'm trying to figure out if the editor of Ezra 1-6
> is the same who wrote/edited Ezra 7-10.
> Has work been done on this? I know there is controversy
> about whether he is the Chronicler, but what about internal
> consistency within Ezra? Has anyone worked on this?
> How should one go about deciding this?
> Thanks,
> Liz
--
_______________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup