Dear Christian Scholars,Return-Path: <Hector3001 AT aol.com>
I asked Rabbi Moshe Laurie, about the 'name in vain' commandment. We agrEed that a literal translation would be " NO MAKING / DOING A NAME OF THE LORD GOD".
I aked him what it would mean to make (or do) a name, and he said "USE".(an idea thAt comes up in Amos 6:10), as in the Orthodox Jewish tradition generally.Am I suposed to say "ALLE:U-ADONAI"? Anthropologists have studied a phenomenon that might be called name-referent confusion Could that be playing a role here? As for invoking the doctrine of the Trinity to help "traanslate" the tetragrammaton, there are a number of heresies one might waant to svoid. Rendering the Tetragraammaaton as "Yesshua" or "Jesus" might leave one open to a charge of Sabellianism (A a "CONFUSION OF THE PERSONS" heresy).Perhaps the tetragraammaton is like the three dot ellipsis in
1, 2, 3, ... .. The problem with translating or saying it is that it represents the infinte. Imaagine some poor translaator trrying to trranslate an English Math book into French. He or she would be ill-advised to attempt:
un, deux, trois, quatre, cinq,
--and so on for hundreds of pages! Omitting the vowels in G-d or YHWH or YVVH puts us on the right track. In the spirit of a via negativa, wwe are referring to the One who is beyond names. He is the one with a thousand names, the one we find in the perfec Silence.
Yours truly,
W. S. (Bill) Anglin
pS If anyone wishes to discuss Hebrew or ORthodox Jewish traddition with an extremely talented and educated man, I reccommend Moshse Laurie. He has HAS A PASSIONSTE INTEREST IN THE USE/trrraanslation of yhwh AAND HIS EMAIL IS moshe3 @aaol.com
.----- Original Message -----
From: furuli AT online.no
Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:08 PM
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] LORD
Dear gfsomsel,
I disagree. I respect the right for those who believe in the trinity
to use "the Lord" instead of a transcription of YHWH, and I respect
the right of those whoh only would write "G-od" to do that. At the
same time I respect the right of the readers of the Biblical text to
read what the text really says. And the text of the Tanach uses YHWH
as the proper name of God, and this should, in faithfulness to the
text, be transcribed in English. In this way all parts would respect
each other.
Best regards
Rolf Furuli
University of Oslo
From Hector3001 AT aol.com Sun Feb 9 07:55:09 2003
V=20From: Polycarp66 AT aol.com
I got drawn into this discussion answering your comment/question on the RS=
do=20preface.=A0 It then got continued much beyond what I desired.=A0 I simply=20=
wish to be drawn back into this discussion.
gfsomsel
From lizfried AT umich.edu Sun Feb 9 10:23:24 2003Return-Path: <lizfried AT umich.edu>
-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org]On Behalf Of
furuli AT online.no
Sent: Sun, February 09, 2003 5:00 AM
To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] LORD
Dear Bill,
If we look at the question from a historical point of view, it was
not a particular interpretation of Scripture that caused people to
stop pronouncing YHWH, but rather foreign influence. In the centuries
after Alexander the Great, the Jews were in many ways influenced by
Greek thoughts, including Plato's view that God is nameless. "A
bitter struggle between Hellenists and Hasidim centered around the
pronunciation of the Divine Name." according to rabbi A. Marmorstein
(1927) "The Old Rabbinic Doctrine of God", p 13. The people at Qumran
ceased pronouncing the name while the Pharisees, Haemerobaptistae and
others continued to pronounce the name.
There are three passages in the Tanach that has something to do with
the use of the name, namely, Lev 24.16, Ex 3.15 and 20:7.
Manuscripts of the LXX from the second century C.E. translate Lev
24:16 in a way suggesting that the name should not be used (we do not
know the original wording); Targum Onkelos does about the same.
However, the rabbis of old did *not* use Lev 24:16 or Ex 20:7 as
reason for not pronouncing the name, according to G. F. Moore (1955)
"Judaism in the First Centuries of the Christian Era. the Age of the
Tannaim Judaism", vol I, p. 428.
It is quite strange that the very passage that definitely says that
the name should always be used, is the passage that was used to show
that the name should not be pronounced, namely, Ex 3:15. For those
interested in the four fanciful ways the words of this verse were
explained to say the opposite of what they do say, please look at the
Jewish lexicon M. M. Kasher (1967) "The Encyclopedia of Biblical
Interpretation", vol II, p. 109.
Best regards
Rolf Furuli
University of Oslo
>Dear Christian Scholars,
>I asked Rabbi Moshe Laurie, about the 'name in vain' commandment. We
>agrEed that a literal translation would be " NO MAKING / DOING A
>NAME OF THE LORD GOD".
>I aked him what it would mean to make (or do) a name, and he said
>"USE".(an idea thAt comes up in Amos 6:10), as in the Orthodox
>Jewish tradition generally.Am I suposed to say "ALLE:U-ADONAI"?
>Anthropologists have studied a phenomenon that might be called
>name-referent confusion Could that be playing a role here? As for
>invoking the doctrine of the Trinity to help "traanslate" the
>tetragrammaton, there are a number of heresies one might waant to
>svoid. Rendering the Tetragraammaaton as "Yesshua" or "Jesus" might
>leave one open to a charge of Sabellianism (A a "CONFUSION OF THE
>PERSONS" heresy).Perhaps the tetragraammaton is like the three dot
>ellipsis in
>1, 2, 3, ... .. The problem with translating or saying it is that it
>represents the infinte. Imaagine some poor translaator trrying to
>trranslate an English Math book into French. He or she would be
>ill-advised to attempt:
>un, deux, trois, quatre, cinq,
>--and so on for hundreds of pages! Omitting the vowels in G-d or
>YHWH or YVVH puts us on the right track. In the spirit of a via
>negativa, wwe are referring to the One who is beyond names. He is
>the one with a thousand names, the one we find in the perfec Silence.
>Yours truly,
>W. S. (Bill) Anglin
>pS If anyone wishes to discuss Hebrew or ORthodox Jewish traddition
>with an extremely talented and educated man, I reccommend Moshse
>Laurie. He has HAS A PASSIONSTE INTEREST IN THE
>USE/trrraanslation of yhwh AAND HIS EMAIL IS moshe3 @aaol.com
>
>.----- Original Message -----
>From: furuli AT online.no
>Sent: Saturday, February 08, 2003 4:08 PM
>To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
>Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] LORD
>
>
>Dear gfsomsel,
>
>
>I disagree. I respect the right for those who believe in the trinity
>to use "the Lord" instead of a transcription of YHWH, and I respect
>the right of those whoh only would write "G-od" to do that. At the
>same time I respect the right of the readers of the Biblical text to
>read what the text really says. And the text of the Tanach uses YHWH
>as the proper name of God, and this should, in faithfulness to the
>text, be transcribed in English. In this way all parts would respect
>each other.
>
>
>Best regards
>
>Rolf Furuli
>University of Oslo
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.