|
Right now I had a rapid look at the evidence as adduced in
the c.ar II BDB entry and thought that it permits one to surmise
that all the instances of bac.c.ar + prep. le are verbs not
nouns (against BDB), since, as it seems, there is no bec.ar li/lka (without
article), but there are instances of beyom c.ar li, beyom being a
well-known relative element, roughly equivalent to ba`$er/ka`$er . The truth is
there is bac.c.ar (e.g. Ps 4:2), without li, an undoubtful noun. Well, I began
to experience doubts. Still, if we admit that c.ar li, mar li are verbs, they
will probably survive as verbs in this syntactic
transformation.
Serge Lyosov
|
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.