Skip to Content.
Please activate JavaScript in your web browser
List archive
Et (Psalms 104:2)
Chronological
Thread
<
Chronological
>
<
Thread
>
From
: "David Taylor" <dave201 AT mail.com>
To
: <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject
: Et (Psalms 104:2)
Date
: Thu, 23 May 2002 16:09:07 -0500
I understand that the setting for the following phrase: " nota shamim" is in
the past-tense. Can it be understood to be continuous?
Regards,
Dave
--
_______________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
Et (Psalms 104:2)
,
David Taylor, 05/23/2002
Archive powered by
MHonArc 2.6.24
.