To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: I AM
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 14:58:41 -0400
----- Original Message -----
From: Shoshanna Walker <rosewalk AT concentric.net>
To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 1:57 PM
Subject: Fw: I AM
> If someone would remind me where exactly this pasuk (Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh) is,
> in the Torah, I will see if I can find if any of the commentaries comment on
> this.
It's Exodus 3, verse 15 i think. Also, it is a mistake to translate this as
most translations do, "I AM THAT I AM" as if the entire clause were the
divine name. Rather, God is answering the implied question, "Who are you?"
(Who shall i say sent me?) by saying, "I am to be identified as I AM." So the
name/appelative is not "I AM WHO/WHAT/THAT I AM", nor "I WILL BE WHO I WILL
BE" or any such nonsence. (And i'm not really trying to comment on the verb
tense here.) Rather, the name is simply "I AM" and the _asher_ clause serves
merely to subordinate. It would not be appropriate to use an _)ETH_ as the
sign of subordination for the verb, nor could any preposition go before a
verb. But something had to show subordiation or rather identification of the
predicate, so the function word _)aSHER_ is used to indicate a clause. Had it
been some other (non-verbal) name, we would expect simply _)EHYEH_ followed
by the predicate noun/adjective.
So we should correctly translate it "I am I AM." This is supported by the
following verse where he says simply "I AM has sent me."
Dan Wagner
NetZero Platinum
No Banner Ads and Unlimited Access
Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month! http://www.netzero.net