From: "Harold R. Holmyard III" <hholmyard AT ont.com>
To: Biblical Hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Paul's quotations (use of "baptism into Moses" in NT)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 20:45:26 -0600
Dear John,
>It may be acceptable grammatically, and "natural" as proven
>by the fact that no one has ever questioned whether the
>antecedant of Xristos should be sou rather than spermati but
>it is theologically impossible. I'd say that lack of study
>of the OT (not grammar) is the reason Paul has not been
>understood.
John, why is the traditional view theologically impossible? Why could the
Abrahamic promises not be made to Christ as the seed of Abraham? Thanks.