From: "George Athas" <gathas AT globalfreeway.com.au>
To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: The Messianic Idea
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 21:00:56 +1100
| >> Then why the reference to David?
| >>
| >Probably added later in the post-exilic period by a Judaean.
| >Although I think Anderson and Freedman in their commentary
| >disagree.
|
| i think liz is correct. this smacks of an editorial insertion, probably
| post exilic and probably Judean.
How do you argue the case, Jim? What leads you to the conclusion? Not that I'm
disagreeing, but I see many arguments based on a vibe rather than evidence,
and then
conclusions and corollaries get built up on them as though the argument were
solid.
Any thoughts?
Best regards,
GEORGE ATHAS
(Sydney, Australia)
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Tel Dan Inscription Website http://members.nbci.com/gathas/teldan.htm
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::