> There are significant biblical indications that the Zadok priesthood
> was
> in fact indigenous to
> Yerusalem and not descended from the Leviym who had become priests in
> YisraEl and originally known as the Shasu Yhw.
Last is just a wild speculation without any basis. The Shasu might well be
the biblical Sinaite Susim. There is however not a single argument to put
together the Susim with the Levites.
Furthermore could the Yhw in Shasu Yhw be anything else as the biblical
Yahweh, but rather an Egyptian toponym, or a further ethnonym.
So it makes no sense to discuss the consequences you derive from your first
supposition.