Subject: Re: Is hakhal the correspondent substantive to ekklesia in LXX
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 23:41:25 +0100
On Sat 22 Jul 2000 (14:08:02), daladier AT elogica.com.br wrote:
> Is qahal the correspondent substantive to ekklesia in LXX?
Yes, generally: see Acts 7:38 ... EH THi EKKLHSIAi EN THi ERHMWi, KTL.
Compare Deuteronomy 18:16, BaYYoWM HaQQaHaL ....
Shalom
Ben
--
Revd Ben Crick, BA CF
<ben.crick AT argonet.co.uk>
232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK) http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm