From: yochanan bitan-buth <ButhFam AT compuserve.com>
To: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: re:Arabic influence on Tiberian pronunciation
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 14:44:33 -0400
RE: Copy of: re:Arabic influence on Tiberian pronunciation
shalom brian, katavta:
>1. In what ways did Arabic influence Tiberian pronunciation?
Personally, I'd say remarkably little.
For example, Arabic `ayin can be lengthened ("doubled") but MT cannot.
Arabic does not bother to add helping vowels before Het and `ayin but MT
does. the MT people are not 'thinking phonemically within Arabic', but they
are apparently preserving a real Hebrew tradition, including subphonemic
data. Quite remarkable, really.
>2. Are the Masoretic gutturals modeled after Arabic gutturals?
So in the light of notes to #1, no.
On the other hand, once the writting tradition started back in pre-1st
temple days the retracted-tongue-root feature will continue to be written
in Hebrew no matter how they were pronouncing it. (retracted-tongue-root is
what makes Tet, Sade, Qof, `ayin and Het distinctive from tav, samex, kaf,
and he.)
>3. Is there an online site than anyone is aware of that one may hear or
>learn Arabic pronunciation?
Wouldn't you rather learn Hebrew with real gutturals? The Living Biblical
Hebrew for Everyone has three CDs with nice clear retracted-tongue-root
(pharyngeal) fricatives, i.e. voiced `ayin qualitatively distinct from alef
and voiceless Het distinct from xaf. Contact me offlist or see the
following: http://buth.jerusalemschool.org
They are alot of fun.