Skip to Content.
Please activate JavaScript in your web browser
List archive
Re: Re[2]: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
Chronological
Thread
<
Chronological
>
<
Thread
>
From
: "Lewis Reich" <lewreich AT javanet.com>
To
: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject
: Re: Re[2]: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
Date
: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 11:29:37 -0400
Peter Kirk wrote (\Thursday, April 06, 2000 12:56 AM):
>
But it is unclear what happened when the woman was
>
already married but not to a close relative.
Wouldn't that simply be adultery?
Lewis Reich
uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Jason Hare, 04/04/2000
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Ben Crick, 04/04/2000
Re: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Michael Miles, 04/04/2000
Re: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Jason Hare, 04/05/2000
Re: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Jonathan D. Safren, 04/05/2000
Re: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Peter Kirk, 04/05/2000
Re: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Harold R. Holmyard III, 04/05/2000
Re[2]: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Peter Kirk, 04/05/2000
Re[2]: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Harold R. Holmyard III, 04/06/2000
Re: Re[2]: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Lewis Reich, 04/06/2000
Re[4]: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Peter Kirk, 04/07/2000
RE: Re[4]: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Bill Ross, 04/07/2000
Re[4]: uncover that nakedness!! :-)
,
Harold R. Holmyard III, 04/08/2000
Archive powered by
MHonArc 2.6.24
.