Skip to Content.
Please activate JavaScript in your web browser
List archive
Re: Solomon's Temple
Chronological
Thread
<
Chronological
>
<
Thread
>
From
: Polycarp66 AT aol.com
To
: rvining AT log.on.ca, b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
Subject
: Re: Solomon's Temple
Date
: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:10:31 EST
In a message dated 2/20/2000 10:35:32 PM Central Daylight Time,
rvining AT log.on.ca writes:
<< Nevertheless, I will modify my statement to read- Same for Solomon
whose magnificent Temple has not yet left a trace.
>>
Even more accurate would be
"Same for Solomon, no trace of whose magnificent temple has yet been found."
This is not to say that we ever will (or won't) find any trace.
gfsomsel
Solomon's Temple
,
Robert Vining, 02/20/2000
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: Solomon's Temple
,
Polycarp66, 02/21/2000
SV: Solomon's Temple
,
Niels Peter Lemche, 02/21/2000
Re: Solomon's Temple
,
Lewis Reich, 02/21/2000
RE: Solomon's Temple
,
Niels Peter Lemche, 02/22/2000
Archive powered by
MHonArc 2.6.24
.