Skip to Content.
Please activate JavaScript in your web browser
List archive
RE: Re[6]: Habiru and Joshua
Chronological
Thread
<
Chronological
>
<
Thread
>
From
: Niels Peter Lemche <npl AT teol.ku.dk>
To
: 'Jonathan Bailey' <jonathan.bailey AT gmx.de>
Cc
: "'b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu'" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject
: RE: Re[6]: Habiru and Joshua
Date
: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 19:21:59 +0100
>
My question, after all the blather from Dr. Barré, remains the same. Is
>
there any
>
indication from Amarna, the Bible, Egyptian records, Assyrian/Babylonian
>
literature,
>
etc. which prevents the Habiru invasion of the Amarna letters from being a
>
14th
>
century conquest of the area by Joshua consumated in the following
>
generation?
>
Could it be that Amarna does not mention Israelites because the Amarna
>
Akkadian/Canaanite word for "Israelite" is "Hebrew"/"Habiru"? Could it be
>
that
>
Philistines are not mentioned in Amarna because that is just not what they
>
called
>
themselves? If these two "can it be"s are answerable in the affirmative,
>
then do the
>
records of the conquests and peoples from Amarna line up with the accounts
>
in
>
Joshua and Judges?
>
Thus Jonathan Bailey
Only that there was no habiru invasion during the Amarna period.
NPL
Habiru and Joshua
,
Jonathan Bailey, 02/08/2000
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re[2]: Habiru and Joshua
,
Jonathan Bailey, 02/09/2000
Re[4]: Habiru and Joshua
,
Jonathan Bailey, 02/09/2000
Re[6]: Habiru and Joshua
,
Jonathan Bailey, 02/09/2000
RE: Re[6]: Habiru and Joshua
,
Niels Peter Lemche, 02/09/2000
Re: Re[6]: Habiru and Joshua
,
Jim West, 02/09/2000
RE: Re[6]: Habiru and Joshua
,
Niels Peter Lemche, 02/09/2000
Re: Re[6]: Habiru and Joshua
,
Jonathan D. Safren, 02/09/2000
Re[8]: Habiru and Joshua
,
Jonathan Bailey, 02/09/2000
Re[8]: Habiru and Joshua
,
Jonathan Bailey, 02/09/2000
Re: Re[8]: Habiru and Joshua
,
Jim West, 02/09/2000
SV: Re[6]: Habiru and Joshua
,
Thomas L. Thompson, 02/10/2000
Archive powered by
MHonArc 2.6.24
.