Subject: Re: Re[8]: 1 Sam 31:5: was Saul necessarily dead?
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2000 20:40:35 -0700
Peter,
> I have abandoned this "not really dead" suggestion and thus any
> further objections to it are both pointless and objectionable. End of
> discussion.
>
> When in response to the "the Amalekite was lying" interpretation, I
> assume your words "just of reader distortion on your part" are
> directed at NPL and Dave Washburn, whose preferred interpretation this
> is, and so I will leave it to them to respond.
It'll have to be NPL then, because I have quit reading Ian's posts.
Dave Washburn http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
Teach me your way, O Lord, and I will walk in your truth;
give me an undivided heart that I may fear your name.
Psalm 86:11