From: "Andrew Davies" <a.davies AT sheffield.ac.uk>
To: "B-Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: FW: JEPD Evidence - Diatessaron
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 09:46:22 -0000
I stand corrected on the Diatessaron, apologies. In that case, I would be
intrigued to see how source critics would divide it up. My guess is that it
wouldn't be quite on the same lines as the originals ...
Andrwe
*****************************************
Dr Andrew Davies
Mattersey Hall
Email a.davies AT sheffield.ac.uk
*****************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen C. Carlson [mailto:scarlson AT mindspring.com]
Sent: 22 December 1999 02:00
To: Biblical Hebrew
Subject: Re: JEPD Evidence - Diatessaron
At 04:31 PM 12/21/99 -0000, Andrew Davies wrote:
>>Tatian's Diatesseron is a document known to be composed of the four
gospels.
>>If the only gospel that survived was the Diatesseron, would scholars be
>>wrong to subdivide it into four sources?
>No, but then this is an entirely different circumstance. Aren't the four
>traditions separated already clearly in the text? I thought they were in
>columns, but then I might be thinking of the hexapla. There is a big
>difference between this and postulating a number of hypothetical sources
>which no one can be sure existed (and no one agrees upon the extent,
>definition, context and characteristics of).
---
You are currently subscribed to b-hebrew as: a.davies AT sheffield.ac.uk To
unsubscribe, forward this message to
$subst('Email.Unsub') To subscribe, send an email to
join-b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu.