>Better [evidence...], I think, than Kirk's supposition that Moses wouldn't
>have carried written records around with him.
1) Why do you insist on calling Peter only by his surname?
2) Have you got any verifiable evidence for a non-sedentary scribe in the
ancient world circa 1000 BCE or earlier?
3) Have you got any contemporary evidence to suppose that Moses was a
scribe, or that he had received the necessary scribal training?
Ian
>Still, though, not entirely convincing. But
>I am reading Genesis right now keeping my eye open for this sort of thing,
and will see
>where it takes me.
Re: Re[6]: JEPD Evidence (Jonathan Bailey),
Ian Hutchesson, 12/19/1999