Skip to Content.
Please activate JavaScript in your web browser
List archive
Re: Perfectivity of wayyiqtols
Chronological
Thread
<
Chronological
>
<
Thread
>
From
: "Matthew Anstey" <manstey AT portal.ca>
To
: "B-Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject
: Re: Perfectivity of wayyiqtols
Date
: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 18:10:09 -0700
Gday Irene,
>
Is there any merit in this observation?
>
Hollow verbs in the qal do not seem to take direct object
>
pronouns---that is, direct object pronouns are not suffixed to
>
the stem.
>
Whether they take direct object nouns, I haven't checked, but if
>
the above observation is correct, my guess would be that they
>
don't.
>
i. riegner
I have found using Bibleworks 578 hollow verbs in qal with bound
object suffix, so I'm not sure what you mean. Could you please
elaborate?
With regards,
Matthew Anstey
Re: Perfectivity of wayyiqtols
,
(continued)
Re: Perfectivity of wayyiqtols
,
Paul Zellmer, 10/20/1999
Re: Perfectivity of wayyiqtols
,
Dave Washburn, 10/20/1999
Re: Re[2]: Perfectivity of wayyiqtols
,
Dave Washburn, 10/20/1999
RE: perfectivity of wayyiqtols
,
Matthew Anstey, 10/20/1999
RE: perfectivity of wayyiqtols
,
Dave Washburn, 10/21/1999
Re[4]: Perfectivity of wayyiqtols
,
peter_kirk, 10/20/1999
Re: Re[4]: Perfectivity of wayyiqtols
,
Dave Washburn, 10/22/1999
Re: Perfectivity of wayyiqtols
,
dan-ake mattsson, 10/23/1999
RE: perfectivity of wayyiqtols
,
Matthew Anstey, 10/23/1999
Re[6]: Perfectivity of wayyiqtols
,
peter_kirk, 10/26/1999
Re: Perfectivity of wayyiqtols
,
Matthew Anstey, 10/29/1999
Archive powered by
MHonArc 2.6.24
.