From: Vincent DeCaen <decaen AT chass.utoronto.ca>
To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
Subject: BH, gentry, hebrew studies 39 (1998)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 09:52:19 -0400 (EDT)
any of you folks work through gentry's piece? i was completely lost with
an aspectual distinction in projective mood: seems to miss a
generalization by having long yiqtol in two different columns.
at any rate, somewhat miffed that he didn't cite my work in the context of
syntax and mood: since that was the burden of my thesis, which he had ni
hand while writing: go figure. got past the readers and editors also: very
puzzling. refutes half the paper; the other half a restatement of revell
and shulman. <scratching my head>
cheers
V
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Dr Vincent DeCaen <decaen AT chass.utoronto.ca>
c/o Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations, 4 Bancroft Ave., 2d floor
University of Toronto, Toronto ON, CANADA, M5S 1A1