To: "Biblical Hebrew" <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: RE: b-hebrew digest: September 21, 1999
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 21:57:25 -0700
Gday Rolf & Dave,
Isn't the bo'u form an imperative? For your information Dave about lebilty:
lebilty + qatal (2x)
lebilty + yiqtol (2x)
lebilty + impv (1x)
lebilty + qetol (79x without intervening lamed; 1x with intervening lamed)
lebilty + qotel (1x - Kethiv)
With regards,
Matthew
RE: b-hebrew digest: September 21, 1999,
Matthew Anstey, 09/22/1999