In my last post I was concentrating on the wayyiqtol as per
the original query in the thread, and I think I created a
misunderstanding about my whole system view. I suggested
"3.5" forms by treating the qatal/weqatal and yiqtol
distinctions sloppily as merely "genre sensitive." Let me
clarify by stating that I hold to "5.5" forms. new summary:
fientive: 1. wayyiqtol (perfective, mainline)
2. yiqtol, long (non-past and generic)
3. yiqtol, short (modal)
attributive: 4. qatal (tells what was/is)
5. weqatal (modal, considering future as a
species of
modality, and mainline)
imperfective 5.5. qotel
Do you think it's justified to distinguish between the
yiqtols?
Shalom,
Bryan
B. M. Rocine
Associate Pastor
Living Word Church
6101 Court St. Rd.
Syracuse, NY 13206