hmmm--- i looked under mem taw samek, lamed, mem in Koheler - Baumgartner---
nothing listed. So presuming it might be a participle i have checked taw
samek lamed- again, nothing.
I also looked under teth samek, lamed--- and again, nothing.
Sorry, but I dont think its a word.
>
>How could it be a Shin in there; that would make it "mitaSHlem," which is
>not what I wrote.
Yes, indeed. Still I was only seeking clarification so that I might be
certain.