Skip to Content.
Please activate JavaScript in your web browser
List archive
Re: 1kings 1:1, zaqen ba
Chronological
Thread
<
Chronological
>
<
Thread
>
From
: yochanan bitan <ButhFam AT compuserve.com>
To
: "Lee R. Martin" <lmartin AT vol.com>
Cc
: b-hebrew <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject
: Re: 1kings 1:1, zaqen ba
Date
: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 03:50:11 -0400
shalom,
(belatedly this week),
on 1k1.1,
>
Since discourses often begin with x-qatal, I would expect ZFQ"N to be
perfect, and B.F
>
to be a participle.
read both zaqen and ba as suffix verbs. (jos 13.1, 23.2 establishes the
idiom)
randall buth
1kings 1:1, zaqen ba
,
Vincent DeCaen, 04/28/1999
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: 1kings 1:1, zaqen ba
,
Lee R. Martin, 04/28/1999
Re: 1kings 1:1, zaqen ba
,
Lee R. Martin, 04/28/1999
Re: 1kings 1:1, zaqen ba
,
Paul Zellmer, 04/28/1999
Re: 1kings 1:1, zaqen ba
,
yochanan bitan, 04/30/1999
Re: 1kings 1:1, zaqen ba
,
John Ronning, 04/30/1999
Re: 1kings 1:1, zaqen ba
,
John Ronning, 04/30/1999
Archive powered by
MHonArc 2.6.24
.