To: Studium Biblicum Franciscanum <sbfnet AT netvision.net.il>, Hebrew List <b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Alviero Niccacci -- Neg. Wayyiqtol
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 13:58:03 -0400
Dear Professor,
In an earlier post you said, "-*lo' + yiqtol* is the negative counterpart of
weqatal,"
but below you have named it the "negative wayyiqtol." I'm afraid that I do
not
understand why. Your earlier post said that " *welo' + qatal*" is negative
wayyiqtol. Could you explain again please.
Studium Biblicum Franciscanum wrote:
>
> tik`aSennĂ¢ = x-yiqtol = apodosis = as ususal). Therefore Hannah wept
> (wattibkeh = wayyiqtol = single event) and did not eat (welo' to'kal =
> negative wayyiqtol = single event). »
--
Lee R. Martin
Pastor, Prospect Church of God, Cleveland, Tennessee
Instructor in Hebrew and Old Testament
Church of God Theological Seminary http://earth.vol.com/~lmartin/
Alviero Niccacci -- Neg. Wayyiqtol,
Lee R. Martin, 04/28/1999