Yes, I think we are getting there now. I thought of "such" as an
English equivalent, but "such a house" means "a similar house" rather
than "the house", "such that" is perhaps better though not quite
right. But then we should not expect a direct equivalent.
Then I thought of another issue which I don't have time to explore. If
):A$ER is not part of the subordinate clause and is followed by the
verb of the subordinate clause, that makes the subordinate clause
verb-initial. That has an impact on the semantics of verb forms. Do
verbs in ):A$ER clauses act as if they were sentence-initial verbs?